Kilimanjaro's Giant Glaciers in Peril

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Cores extracted from the ice fields of Africa's Mount Kilimanjaro are yielding clues about past climate in the region and, together with recent data, helping to forecast the future of the mountain's glaciers. According to a report published today in the journal Science, between 11,000 and 4,000 years ago, the region was generally warmer and wetter than it is today but experienced three major droughts in that time period. In addition, the scientists suspect that Kilimanjaro's ice cover could disappear by 2020 if current climate conditions persist.

Lonnie G. Thompson of Ohio State University and his colleagues collected six ice cores from Africa's highest peak in 2000. The team found that the area surrounding the mountain 9,500 years ago differed significantly from today's landscape. For one, the nearby Lake Chad--which at 17,000 square kilometers is Africa's fourth-largest water body--used to cover 350,000 square kilometers. The researchers also found that methane levels in the core dropped dramatically in the section corresponding to approximately 8,300 years ago. Because methane emissions are tied to the amount of wetlands in a given region, Thompson says that "We believe that this represents a time when the lakes of Africa were drying up." And around 4,000 years ago, the scientists surmise, the region underwent a 300-year drought. This finding meshes well with historical records that discuss a massive drought that hit the Egyptian empire.

The new results represent the first ice core data retrieved from Africa and as such they provide important historical context for climate change in the region. In order to understand the current state of Kilimanjaro's glaciers, the investigators have started collecting continuous data from a mountaintop weather station. So far, they have documented a one-meter retreat by the glacier and a loss of one meter of thickness in the last two and a half years. What is more, maps, aerial photographs and satellite pictures indicate that 80 percent of the ice has disappeared between 1912 and 2000. If the melting continues at this rate, the scientists predict that the snows of Kilimanjaro could vanish within 20 years.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe