Kiss and Tell

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

They had known each other since eighth grade, sharing the silly private jokes that only longtime pals know. Later, they lost touch for a couple of years, when they went to different colleges. But in their senior year the friends—now a young man and woman—became inseparable whenever they were home visiting their families. One evening just after graduation, when he dropped her off at her house in his old green pickup truck, he leaned over and kissed her. He found himself speechless for long moments afterward. She felt a shivery thrill as everything about their comfortable old relationship suddenly seemed to change. A month later he would propose.

My old friend and I have now been married for 18 years, but I remember that moment with crystal clarity. As Chip Walter’s feature article, “Affairs of the Lips,” explains, a smooch can communicate in powerful ways that spoken language does not easily match. “Kisses,” Walter writes, “can convey important information about the status and future of a relationship.” A bad first kiss, too, can bring an otherwise promising beginning to a quick close.

Too much emotion can cloud judgment, particularly when matters turn from deciding about personal attachments to coping with challenging moral questions. Imagine that a runaway trolley will strike five unsuspecting workers around a bend in the tracks ahead. Could you push a stranger in front of the trolley to save the workers? Cold logic might dictate trading one life for five—but would that be “right”? In “When Morality Is Hard to Like,” Jorge Moll and Ricardo de Oliveira-Souza discuss the cognition of morality.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Having a solid relationship or knowing you made the best decision in a bad spot cannot completely shield you from life’s stresses. As Turhan Canli writes in “The Character Code,” understanding an “anxiety gene” could ease suffering for those with mood disorders—and give us yet another important clue about the whys behind our shared human experience.

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina
SA Mind Vol 19 Issue 1This article was published with the title “From the Editor” in SA Mind Vol. 19 No. 1 (), p. 1
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0208-1

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe