New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Know the Jargon: Plantibody

(n.) A human antibody produced by plants

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This past summer doctors treated two Americans infected with Ebola virus with an experimental drug created by Mapp Biopharmaceutical. Both patients lived, although experts are not certain whether the drug contributed to their survival. Named ZMapp, it is a mixture of different antibodies that bind to the virus—and is made by tobacco plants.

Plants do not have antibodies of their own, but they nonetheless have the cellular machinery to make these infection-fighting proteins. Researchers first recognized such potential in 1989 and went on to hijack a tobacco plant's biology to synthesize human antibodies. Since then, several biotech companies have been developing plantibodies that could treat diseases, such as Ebola and rabies.

Plantibody production is straightforward: scientists insert the gene for an antibody into a disarmed virus, which is taken up by a plant's leaves. Using the new DNA, the plant builds the human proteins. Scientists extract them about a week later. The process takes a little over a month—a faster and cheaper means of manufacturing than using hamster ovary cells, which is the standard. Growing the plants is inexpensive, says Julian Ma, an immunologist at St. George's, University of London. “It's basically just soil and water you're paying for.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Despite its ease, plantibody production is not widespread. Most large pharmaceutical companies are reluctant to make the switch because they have invested so much money in ovary cells, Ma says. Until plantibody drugs go through regulatory processes, smaller biotech companies most likely will be the ones producing them.

Plantibodies in development include those designed to target HIV, herpes, cancer and rabies. ZMapp itself is nearly ready to enter clinical trials: a recent study of Ebola-infected monkeys demonstrated its effectiveness. Experts estimate that plantibodies will not go on the market for at least five years, but that projection may change. In September the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services announced that it would like to accelerate ZMapp tests in an 18-month push.

Annie Sneed is a science journalist who has written for the New York Times, Wired, Public Radio International and Fast Company.

More by Annie Sneed
Scientific American Magazine Vol 311 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Know the Jargon” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 311 No. 6 (), p. 24
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1214-24

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe