Kuwait Law Mandating DNA Tests for All Residents Fuels Discontent

The controversial requirement would require 3.5 million people to submit samples to a new government database

Stateless Arabs known as the Bedoon march during a protest to demand citizenship. Some Kuwait residents fear they will face challenges to their own citizenship when a new DNA testing mandate goes into effect.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A Kuwaiti law requiring all residents to submit to genetic testing has sparked international outcry—and there are signs it’s also drawing a muted civil opposition from locals fearful of its scope.

The controversial law, passed in July 2015, mandates that the country’s 1.2 million citizens and another 2.3 million foreigners living in Kuwait submit DNA samples to a new government database. Legislators defend the mandate as a security measure to help the government keep track of criminals and terrorists. Geneticists and human rights groups outside the country call it a gross invasion of privacy.

The law has not yet gone into effect and experts say they’ve been unable to pin down a timeline from the government. But as Kuwait begins the shift to electronic passports this month, there’s renewed concern that the testing will start soon, perhaps with DNA tests for anyone seeking one of the new passports.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The law allows genetic data to be used for any purpose that protects the country and threatens punishment for those who refuse to comply.

“There are reports of a growing opposition within Kuwaiti civil society against this law,” said Mourad Dhina, the executive director of Alkarama, a human rights organization based in Switzerland that focuses on issues in the Arab world.

But Kuwait has strict laws curtailing free speech. Government critics can be swiftly prosecuted or jailed, so opponents of the law have had to tread very carefully.

“It would be very hard to see a more robust [outpouring] of popular disapproval,” said Kristine Beckerle, who studies Kuwait for Human Rights Watch.

But the silence doesn’t mean Kuwait residents support the creation of a nationwide genetic database—or that they’ll comply with the mandate.

Some are worried that information from the database could be used against them. There’s concern it could drum up evidence of infidelity—a crime in the country. There’s also widespread fear it could be used to strip residents of citizenship. Kuwait has strict guidelines on who can claim citizenship in the country.

There’s a clear example of what happens to residents in that situation: The Bedoon, a population of more than 110,000 people in Kuwait see themselves as rightful Kuwaiti residents. The government considers most of them “illegal immigrants” because they’re descended from Iraqis or Saudi Arabians. As a result, many Bedoon are unable to get a driver’s license, a passport, or other benefits of citizenship.

“Hundreds of thousands of people are afraid to take the DNA tests because they’re afraid fraudulent citizen claims would be unearthed,” Beckerle said.

The government is “trying to threaten people who might have come into the country illegally,” said Badr Al Mash’an, a human rights lawyer in Kuwait.

A suit filed in June by a separate human rights lawyer in Kuwait challenges the mandate’s constitutionality on a technicality. Kuwait’s constitution limits punishment to the individual committing a crime, but the genetic testing law would permit the government to jail parents of children who refuse to take the DNA test.

“There’s little hope [that the suit will succeed] because the court is under the control of the government,” Al Mash’an said.

The rumblings of civilian dissent inside Kuwait come as the law draws outrage from human rights activists abroad. A United Nations committee in July called on Kuwait to amend the law, saying it violated the right to privacy. The panel of 18 experts said mandatory genetic testing should only be carried out with a court order on individuals suspected of having committed serious crimes.

That pressure—along with the suspicion that hordes of Kuwait residents might refuse to take the tests—could be making the government reconsider.

Dhina said there are signs the government might forgo nationwide testing, instead opting to enforce the law only on individuals applying for new identification or passports.

If the mandate moves ahead with its sweeping scope, other Gulf countries that have considered similar mandates might consider following suit, Beckerle said. “If people in Kuwait and the rest of the world aren’t the pushing back against it,” she said, “there’s a sincere danger of establishing a really serious precedent on these issues.”

Republished with permission from STAT. This article originally appeared on September 29, 2016

STAT delivers fast, deep, and tough-minded journalism. We take you inside science labs and hospitals, biotech boardrooms, and political backrooms. We dissect crucial discoveries. We examine controversies and puncture hype. We hold individuals and institutions accountable. We introduce you to the power brokers and personalities who are driving a revolution in human health. These are the stories that matter to us all.

More by STAT

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe