New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Lab-Made Motors Could Move and Glow in Cells

Minuscule motor molecules could emit light as they journey into cells

Art concept of a tiny motor inside a cell.

Thomas Fuchs

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

One of nature’s best strategies for movement at the cellular scale involves powerful molecular motors: complex molecules that transform chemical energy into mechanical energy to complete tasks such as transporting components within the cell, contracting muscle fibers and snipping apart strands of DNA.

Since 1999 chemists have been designing synthetic molecules that rotate 360 degrees in response to light or chemical stimuli. These single-function motors can generate forces on a surface, shuttle cargo to sensors and power nanoscale devices. But researchers cannot easily control or track them when they’re placed within opaque biological tissue.

A newly designed molecular motor tackles both these challenges by switching between rotation and fluorescence when hit by different light wavelengths, according to a study published in Science Advances. “Not many compounds show two different responses to light, and this is the very first motor to show this property,” says Maxim Pshenichnikov, a spectroscopist at the University of Groningen in the Netherlands and co-author of the new study.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Pshenichnikov and his colleagues, under the guidance of Groningen organic chemist and 2016 Nobel Prize winner Ben Feringa, created the double-function molecule by attaching a chemical called triphenylamine to a basic molecular motor. This let the motor respond to different light energies in different ways. Low-energy light gave the motor just enough power to rotate, whereas higher-energy light overexcited it, leading it to dispose of excess energy by emitting photons: it fluoresced. Additionally, unlike typical molecular motors driven by tissue-damaging ultraviolet light, this new compound responded to shades of infrared that can penetrate deeper under the skin without damage.

A motor like this one could aid applications that require precise pinpointing. For example, a fluorescent motor could interact with different cellular structures and light up for tracking while delivering and activating a drug. “How cool would it be if we could really follow the motor’s motion in cells and use it for mechanical interference, [drug] delivery and detection?” Feringa says.

Salma Kassem, a chemist at the City University of New York, who was not involved in the study, says the design is an important step toward light-driven pharmacology: “It’s challenging to combine self-reporting and functionality in one small molecule without the two properties interfering with each other. This work achieves role separation in a simple and elegant way.”

The researchers intend to apply the technology to a motor with a biological function, such as binding to certain cell receptors. Then, they will test its performance in live cells or tissues. Study lead author Lukas Pfeifer, an organic chemist at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne, says that this technique’s success “gives me hope that we can easily transfer it to motors made with different chemical compounds.”

Rachel Berkowitz is a freelance science writer and a corresponding editor for Physics Magazine. She is based in Vancouver, British Columbia, and Eastsound, Wash.

More by Rachel Berkowitz
Scientific American Magazine Vol 328 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Tiny Glow” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 328 No. 1 (), p. 14
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0123-14a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe