New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Lake Chad is Disappearing

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: ARGON/LANDSAT

Once one of Africa's largest bodies of freshwater, Lake Chad is disappearing fast, according to a new study published in this week's Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres. "It's about one-twentieth of the size it was 35 years ago," co-author Michael T. Coe says. The lake has been reduced from approximately 25,000 square kilometers in 1963 to only 1,350 square kilometers today. Coe and colleague Jonathan A. Foley, both of the University of Wisconsin at Madison, found natural and man-made causes for the development.

The lake and the Chari River, which flows out of it, constitute the most important water source in the region, and massive irrigation systems¿built by Niger, Nigeria, Cameroon and Chad, the nations that share the lake¿are seriously draining it. The researchers looked at data and observations of the lake going back 43 years. From 1953 to 1979 irrigation had only a modest impact on the ecosystem, but from 1983 to 1994 the water usage for irrigation increased fourfold. Total human water use accounts for roughly 50 percent of the decrease in lake area since the 1960s and 1970s.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The rest of the decrease is due to a shifting climate pattern over the past 40 years. The Lake Chad drainage basin depends on monsoon rains to replenish its water, and this rainfall has dropped dramatically since the early 1960s. According to Coe, the outlook for Lake Chad is gloomy: "It will be a puddle. You¿ll get crops and drinking water out of it, but you'll have no ecosystem left to speak of."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe