New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Landscape Reveals Massive Lava Field Tied to Mass Extinction

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The cause of the largest known mass extinction event, at the end of the Permian period 250 million years ago, remains elusive. The leading candidates for the chaos that killed close to 95 percent of marine species and 70 percent of those on land include dramatic fluctuations in climate or sea level, severe volcanism or an impact with an asteroid or comet. Now findings published in the current issue of the journal Science add further fuel to the debate. Scientists have discovered that the surge of magma that occurred at the time of the Permian extinction was at least twice as extensive as previously believed.

The giant outflow of magma produced the Siberian Traps, volcanic rocks located in an area of Russia known as the Siberian platform. Marc K. Reichow of the University of Leicester in England and his colleagues investigated rocks removed from deep within a basin located nearly 1, 000 kilometers to the west of the platform (see image). After analyzing the chemical and physical structure of these samples, the team determined that the rocks came from the same source as did those in the Siberian Traps. The new findings suggest that the Siberian Traps in fact covered almost 3.9 million square kilometers, an area approximately half the size of Australia, over the course of hundreds of thousands of years. Such an increased flux of magma at the close of the Permian would have added substantially to the volume of climate-changing gases released into the atmosphere. Indeed, the team concludes that "the larger area of volcanism strengthens the link between the volcanism and the end-Permian mass extinction."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe