New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Largest Map of Universe Yet Bolsters Theories about Dark Energy

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Using the light of distant, dying galaxies, astronomers have produced the largest, three-dimensional map of the universe yet. Encompassing roughly 600,000 so-called luminous red galaxies--ancient galaxies with only old, red stars left that are uniquely brilliant--the map extends 5.6 billion light-years out into space, or 40 percent of the way to the edge of the visible universe.

Astrophysicists Nikhil Padmanabhan of Princeton University and David Schlegel of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratories led a team of international colleagues that painstakingly surveyed the color and redshift of 10,000 of these unique galaxies. Using data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey in New Mexico and from a telescope in Australia, the researchers were able to map a fan-shaped slice of the cosmos that covers a tenth of the sky in the Northern Hemisphere. They then applied these measurements to the broader sample to create their three-dimensional map.

"There's statistical uncertainty in applying a brightness-distance relation derived from 10,000 red luminous galaxies to all 600,000 without measuring them individually," Padmanabhan admits. "The game we play is, we have so many that the averages still give us very useful information about their distribution."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


With such a measure of the distribution of matter, the researchers could test a proposed ruler based on regular variations in the grouping of ordinary matter every 450 million light-years or so. "Unfortunately, it's an inconveniently sized ruler," Schlegel says. "We had to sample a huge volume of the universe just to fit the ruler inside."

By showing such regular variations, the map confirms theories about dark energy--a mysterious force that accounts for the acceleration of the universe's expansion. As expected, its influence is outsized, making up nearly 75 percent of the universe's density. "By looking at where density variations were at the time of the cosmic microwave background and seeing how they evolve into a map that covers the last 5.6 billion years, we can see if our estimates of dark energy are correct," Padmanabhan notes. Now the astronomers just need to make even more precise maps--hard to do when so much of the matter is in the dark. The research is slated to appear in an upcoming issue of Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe