Learning to See Requires More Than Just Eyesight

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Although most people take it for granted, learning how to see is a very difficult task. An intriguing case study published in the September issue of Nature Neuroscience describes a man's recovery from 40 years of blindness and should help scientists better understand how the human visual system functions.

Ione Fine of the University of California at San Diego and her colleagues followed Michael May, a 43-year-old man who had been blind since the age of three and a half, as he recovered from experimental stem-cell surgery. The procedure restored sight to his right eye in March of 2000. Ever since, he has been struggling to adapt to a viewable world, a common problem for people who have regained their sense of vision after years of blindness. May finds it particularly difficult to interpret faces and facial expressions--during testing, he could correctly identify a face as male or female only 70 percent of the time, and expressions as happy, neutral or sad 61 percent of the time. In addition, seeing only the face of his own wife is still not enough for him to identify her, and he relies on clues such as hair length or gait to help him recognize people.

To determine what causes these difficulties, the scientists used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRi) to track activity in May's brain as he processed the world around him. Although May's ability to perceive simple forms, colors and motion is essentially normal, the investigators found that when he looks at faces or three-dimensional objects, the brain region active in sighted people during identification is not utilized. This suggests that different parts of the visual system develop at different times, the authors note, with motion processing being more hard-wired and forming very early in life. "The old idea that there is one picture of the world on the surface of the visual cortex is far too simple," remarks study co-author Donald I. A. MacLeod of the University of California at San Diego. "In fact, we probably have a couple dozen maps, each representing a different mode for sensing and taking in our environment." As for May, he is slowly coming to terms with his sight. "The difference between today and two years ago is that I can better guess at what I am seeing," he says. "What is the same is that I am still guessing."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe