Left-Handed Nuclei?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: K. STAROSTA, SUNY

Imagining left- or right-handed nuclei is a little like trying to pat your head, rub your stomach and tap dance all at the same time. Instead of being spherical, they are shaped like elongated cigars, having three axes of different lengths. And instead of having all of their protons and neutrons paired up and moving as a central unit, they have oddball nucleons that orbit the core independently. In fact, one nucleon orbits the longest axis, one orbits the shortest axis¿and the core spins around the third axis. It is because there are two ways to pull this trick off that these nuclei are said to be "handed."

Until now no one was sure they even existed. Stefan Frauendorf of the University of Notre Dame and the Rossendorf Research Center in Germany and his colleagues showed that handedness was theoretically possible for these odd-odd triaxial nuclei a few years back. But in the February 5 issue of Physical Review Letters, Frauendorf's team¿in collaboration with Krzysztof Starosta of the State University of New York and others¿offers experimental proof.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The scientists aimed beams of heavy ions at targets of certain elements to produce nuclei with 75 neutrons and 55, 57, 59 or 61 protons in a wide range of spin states. Then they detected gamma rays emitted by the nuclei and measured the energies of each spin state. What they found were doublets. These pairs of closely spaced energy states had the same amounts of angular momentum and corresponded to seemingly identical nuclei¿facts that the physicists took as evidence of handedness. The discovery, researchers say, could shed light on our most basic knowledge of nuclear structure.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe