New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Lensless On-Chip Microscope Inspired by "Floaters" in the Eye

In pursuit of an iPhone-size tool to monitor cancer and diagnose malaria

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Researchers hope that a new kind of small portable microscope may give health workers the ability to quickly and cheaply scan blood for tumor cells and life-threatening parasites.

What makes the microscope unique is the way it scans objects without lenses, and that it was inspired by a phenomenon that usually clouds vision instead of improving it.

A team from the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) has demonstrated that light-sensitive microchips like those found in digital cameras can produce high-resolution images of microscopic beads and worms about a millimeter long.

Writing in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, they report that prototype lensless microscopes resolved details down to approximately 0.8 to 0.9 microns, or thousandths of a millimeter. (One millimeter equals 0.04 inch.) This is good enough to spot cancer cells, which measure 15 to 30 microns.

Here's how it works: Scientists shine light onto a liquid sample flowing through a narrow channel. Below the channel are a series of three-micron-wide apertures, or holes, punched through a layer of metal such as gold or aluminum. The light shines through the holes onto a semiconductor chip studded with a series of sensor pixels. Such chips cost about $10 a pop, says Caltech bioengineer and study leader Changhuei Yang.

Objects that float over the apertures block some of the incoming light received by the pixels, which reconstruct an image of the object based on the variations in light intensity across multiple apertures.

Yang says he was inspired by "floaters," the clumps of dead cells and other debris in the eye that are sometimes visible when staring at blue sky or other uniform sources of light. He says floaters are more common with age and in some eye conditions such as myopia.

Normally we see objects because the lens of the eye focuses an image onto the retina, often with help from corrective lenses. But floaters float right above the retina, where we can see them directly.

Conventional microscopes use lenses to magnify microscopic features for the eye to see, but lenses are hard to make small for use in portable handheld devices or for scanning lots of biological samples simultaneously, which would aid research.

With a chip-based microscope, "there's no lens to break," Yang says. "A clinician can stick this into his back pocket."

He says he sees the technology as the basis for rugged, iPod-size scanners capable of quickly diagnosing the presence of the blood parasites that cause malaria and sleeping sickness (human African trypanosomiasis), which are both endemic in sub-Saharan Africa.

Another possible application is scanning the blood of cancer patients for cancerous cells circulating in the body that may take root in other organs, a phenomenon known as metastasis that often signals a poor prognosis.

Right now, such cells can be collected on membranes, but transferring the cells to microscope slides is relatively complicated and expensive, says pathologist Richard Cote of the Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, who was not part of the Caltech team but is working with Yang to develop a chip-based system to probe those samples directly.

Micron resolution is sufficient for basic tasks, he says, such as counting the number of potentially dangerous cancer cells. He says the lensless microscope "would be a way of actually disseminating the technology much more broadly."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe