New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Leopard-like Creature Is the Oldest Big Cat Yet Found

The discovery of Panthera blytheae fossils strengthens an Asian origin for pantherine carnivores

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Big cats similar to today’s snow leopard have prowled the Himalayas for the last 6 million years, an analysis of newly described fossils reveals. The remains of Panthera blytheae extend the known lineage of pantherine cats by at least 2 million years and bolster the notion that this group of carnivores originated in Asia.

Researchers unearthed bones representing at least three individuals in southwestern Tibet. The most complete remnants include a partial adult skull with several teeth still embedded in the upper jaw, says Jack Tseng, a vertebrate paleontologist at the American Museum of Natural History in New York. Those fragments were excavated from rocks about 4.42 million years old, but other fossils belonging to the same species came from nearby strata that were laid down about 5.95 million years ago, he and his colleagues report today in Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

“These are beautiful fossils of great significance,” says Zhe-Xi Luo, a vertebrate paleontologist at the University of Chicago in Illinois who was not involved in the study. “They add an evolutionary root to the pantherine family tree.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Many features of the P. blytheae’s teeth are similar to those of the snow leopard, but some ridges and cusps are distinct, indicating that the fossils represent a new species. Judging from the size of the partial skull, the big cat was about the same size as the clouded leopard and about 10% smaller than the snow leopard, both of which live in the Himalayas today. A comparison of dozens of anatomical features for 12 living and extinct species of felines indicates that the snow leopard is P. blytheae’s “sister species”, says Tseng. Today’s tiger is also a very close relative, he adds.

Previously, the oldest known fossils of pantherine cats were fragmentary remains unearthed from 3.8-million-year-old rocks in Africa. That finding inspired some scientists to suggest that big cats originated there and then spread to new habitats elsewhere. But the new specimens, and the greater diversity of big cats in eastern and southern Asia, supports the idea that this group first appeared in Asia, says Tseng. The current pantherine family tree, as well as genetic analyses of living or recently extinct species, suggests that the group first evolved about 16 million years ago.

The evolutionarily advanced characteristics of P. blytheae are somewhat surprising, says Lars Werdelin, a vertebrate paleontologist at the Swedish Museum of Natural History in Stockholm. “I’d have expected something this old to resemble more of a basal [less evolved] cat.”

P. blytheae's striking similarity to modern species such as the snow leopard and clouded leopard makes it hard to say what pantherine progenitors might have looked like, Werdelin adds: “We’d need quite a lot of intermediate fossils to know how the lineage developed.” It is even possible, he says, that paleontologists have already unearthed some of those ancient forebears but, lacking transitional fossils, have not yet recognized them for what they are.

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on November 13, 2013.

Sid Perkins, who writes most often about Earth and planetary sciences, materials science and paleontology, is based in Crossville, Tenn.

More by Sid Perkins

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe