New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Let’s Science That: A Tool for Solving Humanity’s Greatest Challenges

As an editor, I've never been a big fan of turning nouns into verbs when perfectly good options already exist. But I'd be happy to see us use “science” that way. It's a powerful, evidence-based process of conducting experiments, gathering data and performing analysis on the results. It's at once a methodical set of practices and a tool that inspires hope for a brighter future by advancing discovery and innovation.

That's why our cover story, “Top 10 Emerging Technologies of 2017,” has a special resonance for me. It's about world-changing ideas coming out of the labs that are poised to help us lead better, healthier lives. Scientific American produced the section in collaboration with the World Economic Forum. The Forum annually brings together business and policy leaders—and, increasingly, scientists and their research—to discuss ways we can work together to tackle the world's greatest challenges.

The partnership that led to this special report began three years ago. I was invited to serve as vice chair of one of the Forum's past Global Agenda Councils, focused on identifying emerging technologies. Our chair was the irrepressible polymath Bernard S. Meyerson, chief innovation officer of IBM. With the help of knowledgeable council members, we produced terrific lists for two years.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


After our council term ended, our Forum lead, Rigas Hadzilacos, asked me if Scientific American might like to continue to help develop the Top 10 Emerging Technologies list. He proposed that we could tap the knowledge of members of the Forum's Expert Network and Global Future Councils; we also planned to reach out to the ever savvy Scientific American board of advisers and other specialists who keenly observe developing innovations. Not least, Meyerson also smilingly told me he'd enjoy the chance to work for me this time around. How could I resist an opportunity like that? I'm grateful to all who generously helped to shape this collaboration and to the editorial team members who have now brought it to you in this edition.

Elsewhere in our pages, you'll find lots of other ways science is making a difference: changing everything we thought we knew about a “former” planet (“Pluto Revealed”); helping us understand how the tragic history of stolen people has forged modern society (“How Captives Changed the World”); illuminating the true population health of American burying beetles (“Beetle Resurrection”); and exploring the implications of possibly using new gene-editing techniques to preserve ecosystems in the Galápagos. Have a question? Let's science that.

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina
Scientific American Magazine Vol 317 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Let's Science That” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 317 No. 6 (), p. 4
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1217-4

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe