New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Letters

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The cover story for October 2004, "Controlling Hurricanes," could not have been more timely, coming out as Florida suffered devastating visits from four major hurricanes.

Many readers drew hope from the possibility of either dissipating or diverting these storms. Others offered a slew of their own ideas on how to accomplish such a feat, whose success could be considered a step toward the ultimate accomplishment in humanity's age-old drive to tame the environment--controlling the weather. Yet many other readers expressed concern about the consequences. David Laden of Virginia Beach, Va., writes, "The rainfall from hurricanes can break droughts." Whereas Richard Foy of Redondo Beach, Calif., writes, "It is fascinating that you leave out the most effective way of controlling hurricanes--reducing global warming." Robert H. Myers of South Russell, Ohio, poses the question: "Are we truly so arrogant and stupid to think that altering these storms is a good thing? Once again, the technology of 'what we can do' has far outstripped the ethical concept of 'should we?'"

Scientific American Magazine Vol 292 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Letters” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 292 No. 2 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican022005-4mGsXos2WQUU9tuN1sJZ8n

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe