Letters to the Editors, May 2005
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
If a theme emerged from the January issue, it was health and well-being, including the valuable insights gained by researchers who have resurrected the deadliest flu in history--a plague that is still less than a human lifetime in the past. Writes Laurence Garvie of McMinnville, Ore., "I was told that at the age of two I nearly died of the 1918 influenza. In the 86 years since then I have never had the flu. I have often wondered if this early attack immunized me."
The most fertile soil for reader response proved to be the provocative article on the "myth" of self-esteem, which questioned the notion that boosting students' self-esteem improves grades and behavior. William F. Bertolette of Baton Rouge, La., also gleaned from the story "the great word 'floccinaucinihilipilification' (meaning 'the action or habit of estimating as worthless'), which also describes the attitude of so many New Orleans Saints fans." Nevertheless, we've estimated our reader comments on this article and others as anything but inutile.
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
