Letters to the Editors, July 2005

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Responses to March's cover story, "How Did Humans First Alter Global Climate?" by William F. Ruddiman, were outnumbered only by a multitude of reader questions, observations and alternative theories addressed to "Misconceptions about the Big Bang," by Charles H. Lineweaver and Tamara M. Davis. Although many felt this article went where none had gone before in clearing up several cosmological misconceptions, the answers left one reader a tad disappointed in the possibilities an expanding universe might have afforded her interior space. Marianne Vespry of Hamilton, Ontario, writes: "As I read this article, I began to hope that my condominium closets might be getting bigger with the expansion of the universe, so that by summer there would be room for the new outfits I will undoubtedly buy. But no, I learned that the universe grows larger without expanding either Planet Earth or my closets." We trust the following will expand your knowledge--the constraints of cosmology and earthly real estate notwithstanding.

8,000 Years of Human Warmth
In "How Did Humans First Alter Global Climate?" William F. Ruddiman suggests that carbon dioxide (CO2) released as our ancestors cleared forests to plant crops over the past 8,000 years prevented the onset of the next ice age.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 293 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Letters” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 293 No. 1 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican072005-182zHLnvyfAJq9zFlauceU

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe