Letters to the Editors, October 2005

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


TWO ARTICLES in June proved to be not only provocative but complementary. "Doubt Is Their Product," by David Michaels, discussed efforts by corporations and interest groups to employ their own research to undermine the science supporting product regulation. Many readers suspected they had found an example of such intentionally generated uncertainty in "Obesity: An Overblown Epidemic," W. Wayt Gibbs's report on assertions by researchers that the government, medical establishment and media are misleading the public on the health consequences of rising body weight.

For all the heat, there was a really cool article, "Buying Time in Suspended Animation," by Mark B. Roth and Todd Nystul, that prompted Elbert Pence of Kenmore, Wash., to wonder about the chilling implications of a hiatus from an active lifestyle: "Will the government cut off my Social Security payments if I decide to go into suspended animation? If so, will they be restored when I am warmed back up to 98.6?"

Scientific American Magazine Vol 293 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Letters” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 293 No. 4 (), p. 10
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1005-10

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe