On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Numerous Readers responded to "Mindful of Symbols," by Judy S. DeLoache, in the August issue, which described the difficulties children encounter as they learn to think symbolically. Geoff Baldwin of Portola Valley, Calif., recalled his own childhood experience: "I saw drawings of airplanes and thought I could cut them out to get small model planes. I remember being baffled and frustrated when they did not pop into three dimensions."
Even curiouser is when adults respond to symbols rather than what they represent: an illustration of an orchestra in "Is the Universe Out of Tune?" by Glenn D. Starkman and Dominik J. Schwarz, showed discordance in the "symphony" of the cosmic microwave background emanating from the tuba. Carl Dershem chimed in: "Sure, blame us tuba players! The tuba is the Rodney Dangerfield of instruments--it gets no respect!" But there was nothing abstract about an e-mailed reality check that challenged the statement made in the story's cover headline, "Bad Harmonies in the Microwave Music Defy Theory." Wrote Duane Bonvallet: "Really. I'm betting the universe is right and the theory is wrong. How are you betting?"
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
