Letters to the Editors, June 2006

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Topics ranging from tabletop reactors to forensic investigations of the first president helped to pep up the humdrum month of February for readers. Two articles that caught letter writers' attention were about rethinking established technology: In "Plasma Accelerators," Chandrashekhar Joshi showed how small, inexpensive particle accelerators promise a wealth of data in lower-energy research. "Protecting New Orleans," by Mark Fischetti, assessed various flood-control system designs for the Mississippi Delta able to withstand major storms and rising sea levels.

In "Putting a Face on the First President," forensic anthropologist Jeffrey H. Schwartz intriguingly chronicled how he solved the mystery of what George Washington looked like as a young man. A number of readers noticed a curious resemblance. Harry Melkonian wrote via e-mail, "From what I can see from the digital reconstruction, the 19-year-old Washington looked like a young Jack Benny. Well! Now cut that out!"

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American