Letters to the Editors, June 2006
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Topics ranging from tabletop reactors to forensic investigations of the first president helped to pep up the humdrum month of February for readers. Two articles that caught letter writers' attention were about rethinking established technology: In "Plasma Accelerators," Chandrashekhar Joshi showed how small, inexpensive particle accelerators promise a wealth of data in lower-energy research. "Protecting New Orleans," by Mark Fischetti, assessed various flood-control system designs for the Mississippi Delta able to withstand major storms and rising sea levels.
In "Putting a Face on the First President," forensic anthropologist Jeffrey H. Schwartz intriguingly chronicled how he solved the mystery of what George Washington looked like as a young man. A number of readers noticed a curious resemblance. Harry Melkonian wrote via e-mail, "From what I can see from the digital reconstruction, the 19-year-old Washington looked like a young Jack Benny. Well! Now cut that out!"
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
