Letters to the Editors, April 2007
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Our Scientific American 50 award for Policy Leader of the Year to Al Gore for spreading awareness of climate change was the most controversial item of the December 2006 issue. Some correspondents were wholly dismissive of Gore's efforts; others felt he erred in oversimplifying a complicated subject. "The earth's atmosphere is very complex, yet Gore asserts that climate warming is due to one factor: the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere," wrote H. G. Stuebing of Doylestown, Pa. "It seems only prudent to reduce CO2 emissions, but it is not clear that this will solve the problem."
Questions of scientific consensus regarding other topics in the issue inspired respondents to pontificate on the legitimacy of subliminal persuasion, the definition of an "industrial revolution," and the moral implications of emergent information-scanning technology.
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
