Letters

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

The August issue garnered much interest--that is, vigorous reader dissent, questions and analysis. Although most letter writers welcomed guest essayist Mihail C. Roco's optimistic look at nanotechnology in "Nanotechnology's Future" [Forum], some issued thoughtful caveats about its unforeseen dangers.

The bulk of the dissent, however, was reserved for the cover story "The Expert Mind," by Philip E. Ross, which suggested that studies of the development of chess grandmasters' mental processes may reveal how expertise in all fields is fostered. For those readers who assume that innate ability is the foundation of great achievement, Ross cited research--relating to motivation and the ability to "chunk" information--indicating that experts are made, not born. Much of the criticism was echoed by Doug Jannusch of Kaneohe, Hawaii: "This is an insufficient dismissal of the role of talent in music, chess and sports," its greatest shortfall being "the lack of explanation for the role of intelligence in determining success. Let's face it--some people are simply smarter, faster or stronger than others."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American