Letters to the Editors, May 2007

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

READERS RESPONDED with great passion to our January issue. Although Bill Gates's vision of the developing robotics industry instigated much debate, the majority of letters centered on Matthew L. Wald's article and its pessimistic view of corn-based ethanol fuel. Correspondents argued from all sides of this issue, although a large number echoed Joyce Ferree of Salida, Colo.: "Ethanol may not be the perfect fuel, but it is showing Americans that there are alternatives to foreign oil that stimulate rural economies across the U.S., improve our foreign trade balance and don't require our military to keep the supply coming.... Corn ethanol is not a 'bridge to nowhere' if we look at it as a solid foundation for a new industry to build on."

CORN-FED BEEF
In "Is Ethanol for the Long Haul?" Matthew L. Wald speculates that ethanol producers may turn to coal or even electricity for process heat instead of natural gas because that fuel has become expensive. Although a small minority of new ethanol plants use coal instead of natural gas, an encouraging trend appears to be a switch to renewable biomass for processing, which greatly reduces fossil-fuel use. Several new and existing ethanol plants have taken this path, yet Wald makes no mention of it.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American