Letters to the Editors, November 2006

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

If a theme emerged from the July issue, it was the technology that enhances our observational abilities. In "The Quest for the Superlens," John B. Pendry and David R. Smith wrote about building a lens that could overcome the resolution limits of the illuminating light wavelengths. "Hubble's Top 10," by Mario Livio, reviewed the greatest discoveries made with the orbiting Hubble Space Telescope. In "CSI: The Reality," Max M. Houck looked at how the portrayal of criminal investigation tools and methodologies on television forensics dramas might be making viewers unreasonable jurors in real-life courtrooms.

But even with better observational tools, can we trust the initial conclusions we draw from them? Not likely. In "The Political Brain" [Skeptic], Michael Shermer reported that a brain-imaging study showed our predilections to be a product of unconscious confirmation bias. Henry McDonald of Danville, Calif., found everyday evidence: "I believe that confirmation bias is an evolutionary trait that bonds the family together, thus increasing our chance of survival. The fact that my wife of 51 years still loves me and thinks I am terrific is positive proof of confirmation bias."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American