Letters to the Editors, November 2007

Faith Debate--Stormy Weather--Snoozing Mice

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Religion’s Roles
The dialogue between Lawrence M. Krauss and Richard Dawkins on religion in “Should Science Speak to Faith?” is almost as frustrating as Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell discussing cosmology. Both authors seem to assume that Christian fundamentalism provides a paradigm for all religion, which is sufficiently defined by its collision with biology and cosmology. Other faiths and Christian groups have never had such problems with science.

Religion is also about purpose, value and identity, the meaning of existence, the significance of human life, and the critique of our moral values. Slavery was abolished when Christians finally understood its incompatibility with their teachings. And if religion has known sin, so have science and atheism. Ask J. Robert Oppenheimer and Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn.
Ron Partridge England

Scientific American Magazine Vol 297 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Letters” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 297 No. 5 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican112007-6j0niWL99MUBmhxA9h3XTw

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe