Letters to the Editors, October 2007

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“America’s ecosystems have evolved since the Pleistocene; the consequences of introductions
of exotic megafauna to the continent cannot be predicted.”
—Dustin Rubenstein et al.

Rewilding Rebuttal
In “Restoring America’s Big, Wild Animals,” C. Josh Donlan reiterates a proposal to populate the American West with species (lions, cheetahs and elephants) he considers “proxies” for extinct megafauna present there in the Pleistocene. Donlan  mentions some of our concerns, published in Biological Conservation in October 2006, but dismisses them unfairly. For example, we referenced Jurassic Park to emphasize his plan’s sensationalism, not out of confusion about evolutionary time­scales. There is a fundamental difference between “rewilding” and “Pleistocene rewilding.” Rewilding involves reintro­ducing species extirpated within the past few hundred years to their native habitats; neither species nor habitats can have changed much in that time. The successful reintroduction of the Bolson tortoise to New Mexico is an example of this. Pleistocene rewilding would involve introducing exotic species Donlan hopes will fill the ecological roles of their Pleistocene ancestors.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 297 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Rewilding Network Coding Traveler's Dilemma” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 297 No. 4 (), p. 12
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican102007-3uncn0MAavrkhzIkXPL6YH

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe