Letters to the Editors, March 2007

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"Jeffrey D. Sachs is a great man, doing great things for people around the world," began a note from Trey Strawn of Winter Springs, Fla. "His battle against poverty is inspiring. 'Welfare States, beyond Ideology' [Sustainable Developments], however, is unscientific, biased and wrong." Find out why readers such as Strawn responded with some heat to Sachs's November 2006 column in the letters below. Correspondents were also drawn to fiery phenomena in other articles in that issue: from the mysterious sparkings in our brains' inner space explored in a special section on mirror neurons to the first light of outer space described in an article about the Dark Ages of the universe.

NEURON SEE, NEURON DO
I am a clinician who often works with children and adolescents with Asper?ger's syndrome, and I am an author of two books on the subject. The research and theory described in "Mirrors in the Mind," by Giacomo Rizzolatti, Leo?nardo Fogassi and Vittorio Gallese, and in "Broken Mirrors: A Theory of Autism," by Vilayanur S. Ramachandran and Lindsay M. Oberman, are consistent with, and help to explain, what these children experience and what others experience when they are with them. Those autistics who are higher functioning can learn about our language, such as the meaning of specific metaphors. They can even use these metaphors by translating, although not from their own intrinsic understanding.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 296 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Letters” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 296 No. 3 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican032007-3G1vK7XpfpbxgJQLTzIxG7

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe