Liability of Telegraphic Companies in England

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The Court of Queen's Bench, says the London Times, wu lately occupied with a ease of great importance to the commercial world. In the month of July, 1857, a report reached the head-quarters in London of the South Eastern Railway Company that the Lewes Bank had stopped payment. The cashier of the company adopted the report, and telegraphed to their servants at the various stations on the line that they were to take no more notes or checks on the Lewes Bank. The notice of the alleged stoppage was also ported up at some of the stations, alongside a correct announcement that the Hastings Bank had suspended payment. In consequence of the publication of the false report, there was a run upon the Lewes Bank, in order to meet which the securities had to be realized at an enormous loss. The jury gare a verdict for the plaintiff, with $10,000 damages. It appeared from the statement of the counsel that if the message of the cashier had not been published at the stations, it might have been looked upon as a privileged communication between the cashier and the subordinate servants of the company.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 50This article was published with the title “Liability of Telegraphic Companies in England” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 50 (), p. 393
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican08211858-393

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe