Life Found Lurking under Arctic Rocks

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The Arctic tundra would not appear a welcoming environment for life. But a paper published today in the journal Nature suggests that polar deserts may house photosynthetic organisms in a very unlikely place--under rocks. The discovery of the photosynthetic cyanobacteria could potentially double estimates of the carbon sequestration potential in these extreme environments.

Charles S. Cockell and M. Dale Stokes of the British Antarctic Survey surveyed some 850 rocks on two islands in the Canadian High Arctic, where vegetation covers less than 2 percent of the land. The researchers discovered that more than 90 percent of the rocks were colonized with life. Because the cyanobacteria require light to survive, the finding was surprising. But as Cockell explains, ¿We found that in fact the opaque rocks protect the micro-organisms and the movement of the rocks during the annual freeze-thaw allows crack to form and light to penetrate beneath the surface.¿ When the team searched terrain in the Antarctic that was formed by glaciers freezing and thawing, it found 100 percent colonization near the edges, whereas only 5 percent of the rocks near the center--which receive less light--harbored bacteria.

The scientists also estimated how much carbon the newly discovered bacteria could take up and determined that its productivity was nearly equal to that of the surface plants, including lichens and mosses. ¿This shows us that places we may think of as extreme--for example other planets like Mars--could nurture surprising habitats for life," Cockell remarks.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe