New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Life Found Lurking under Arctic Rocks

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The Arctic tundra would not appear a welcoming environment for life. But a paper published today in the journal Nature suggests that polar deserts may house photosynthetic organisms in a very unlikely place--under rocks. The discovery of the photosynthetic cyanobacteria could potentially double estimates of the carbon sequestration potential in these extreme environments.

Charles S. Cockell and M. Dale Stokes of the British Antarctic Survey surveyed some 850 rocks on two islands in the Canadian High Arctic, where vegetation covers less than 2 percent of the land. The researchers discovered that more than 90 percent of the rocks were colonized with life. Because the cyanobacteria require light to survive, the finding was surprising. But as Cockell explains, ¿We found that in fact the opaque rocks protect the micro-organisms and the movement of the rocks during the annual freeze-thaw allows crack to form and light to penetrate beneath the surface.¿ When the team searched terrain in the Antarctic that was formed by glaciers freezing and thawing, it found 100 percent colonization near the edges, whereas only 5 percent of the rocks near the center--which receive less light--harbored bacteria.

The scientists also estimated how much carbon the newly discovered bacteria could take up and determined that its productivity was nearly equal to that of the surface plants, including lichens and mosses. ¿This shows us that places we may think of as extreme--for example other planets like Mars--could nurture surprising habitats for life," Cockell remarks.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe