New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Lightening the Load at Landfills?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Scientists are breathing new life into old idea for making bacteria degrade landfill waste--without oxygen and thus odors. In the 1960s, researchers first tested the idea of putting anerobic bacteria to work on industrial waste water. Although the bacteria would successfully break down the organic waste for a period of time, the process always petered out. Now scientists know that the bacteria weren't getting the nutrients they needed to keep on living. And based on the results of a recent year-long pilot project at the Lycoming County landfill in Pennsylvania, they know that anerobic bacteria might help solve the landfill problem after all.

At Lycoming, some 1,000 tons of trash are dumped each day into the landfill, which is more than 20 years-old and rises some 200 feet above the road. Within 11 years, there will be no more room for trash. So Thomas DiStefano at Bucknell University--working with his former mentor, Richard Speece at Vanderbilt University--installed series of toaster-sized bioreactors to test the potential anerobic bacteria might have to lighten the landfill's load. Recycled water in one reactor converted the garbage into simple organic acids. These in turn were pumped into a second reactor, where the bacteria converted them into methane gas--which can be used to produce electricity. A residue from the reaction works well as a soil nutrient, they say.

Looking at the initial data, DiStefano estimates that a full-scale anerobic operation applied to food wastes alone--which account for up to 10 percent of the garbage dumped at Lycoming--would generate some 88 million cubic feet of methane and 2,600 tons of soil nutrient each year. Ultimately, he hopes the bioreactors could convert from 50 to 70 percent of all the organic waste now being buried. The county commissioners were sufficiently convinced to extend his contract for another two years. "This is cutting edge," Speece says, "and it is a privilege to be associated with something that probably 10 years down the line will be commonplace."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe