Lightning from the Earth—Houses Struck

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


On the 19th ult., during a severe thunder storm, the house of Sterling Armstrong, in Newark, N. J., was struck with lightning, although it had a lightning rod. Some person went and examined the house afterwards, and published a letter in the "Newark Advertiser," asserting that the lightning which struck the houae came out 0/ the ground. This he judged from the course of the lightning and its effects. From the description which he gave of the effects of this flash of lightning, no evidence was presented that would have led us to conclude that it came out of the ground ; we do not believe that a single house ever was struck with lightning from the ground. Since the time the account was first published of this house being struck, E. Mer-riam, of Brooklyn, who has given great attention to such subjects, has visited it and made a careful examination of the course of the lightning and its effects. He has formed a very different opinion from that of the other person who believed that the house was struck with lightning :rom the ground. He describes how the lightning came from the clouds, and minutely points out its course, and the reason why it was so struck while it had a lightning rod. This rod was made of good iron, and was of a proper thickness, but its points were painted with white paint, and so was the whole rod excepting that part on the roof of the house. This was bare; the lightest ning passed from the upper line of the un-painted part until it catne to the paint, then passed off to nails in the shingles, and from them descended through the house. He asserts that he never saw a painted rod perform the duties of a conductor. Here then we have evidence and an opinion that Faraday is wrong in respect to the solid section of the rod ; the surface and not the solid section, according to Mr. Merriam, is the grand desideratum. Nay, this goes to prove that lightning is conducted on the surface only ; for if this were not so, the current spoken of would not have left this rod when it came to the paint, but have passed down through it, as through the covered wires of the telegraph.— There appears to be a discrepancy here, upon which light is required to be shed.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 51This article was published with the title “Lightning from the Earth—Houses Struck” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 51 (), p. 408
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican09031853-408a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe