Like Fine Wine, Personality Improves with Age

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Growing older gives us much to grumble about, but new findings may help to offset those woes: personality, scientists say, appears to improve with age. Some experts argue that personality is genetically programmed to stop changing at a certain age. Others assert that some aspects may morph throughout adulthood, but not much. The new work suggests that personality is plastic and that the changes that come with age are generally for the better.

Psychologists divide personality into five major traits: agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, openness and extraversion. According to researchers who subscribe to the notion that our genes dictate when our personalities stop changing, the "big five" are set for life by age 30. Some workers, however, contend that experiences that occur in adulthood--from beginning a career to having children--can mold personality too.

To begin to understand how personality traits might change through early and middle adulthood, Sanjay Srivastava of Stanford University and his colleagues studied how the average traits varied by age and gender. The study, published today in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, compared the personalities of 132,515 adults between the ages of 21 and 60 who completed an Internet "personality test." The survey was posted on the Web site www.outofservice.com and participants were those who had opted to answer the questionnaire for automatic feedback on their personality "ratings."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The team found that conscientiousness increased with age, with the biggest jumps occurring among those individuals in their 20s. Agreeableness also climbed with age, largely among thirty-somethings. Men and women differed in their relative neuroticism: as women aged, their neurotic tendencies declined, but this was not the case for men. Openness waned slightly for both sexes, as did extraversion in women.

"The changes in conscientiousness and agreeableness line up with when people increase their work responsibilities and then when they have kids," Srivastava says. But, he adds, they weren't studying the reasons why the changes occur, and they collected only basic demographic information. Now that Srivastava and his colleagues have ascertained that personality does indeed change throughout adulthood they plan to look into why it happens. "This is a hopeful message about aging," he observes. "It's so often viewed as a process of decline -- your hair falls out, your teeth fall out -- but we're seeing aging as a process of development. All the biggest changes were for the better."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe