New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Like staying up late? You may be putting yourself at risk of heart problems

A study of more than 320,000 people found that night owls are more likely to engage in behaviors that increase the risk of cardiovascular disease such as smoking and sleeping poorly

Woman hides under white blanket, only her long curly hair and dark manicured hands are visible

Alina Kostrytsia/Getty

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Staying up late to binge a favorite TV show or go out with friends can be one of life’s simple pleasures. But being a habitual night owl—especially if you are a woman—may be putting your heart at risk, new research suggests.

In a study of more than 320,000 adults, researchers found that participants who described themselves as “definitely an ‘evening’ person” were about 16 percent more at risk of having a heart attack or stroke compared with those who didn’t report a strong bedtime preference.

The study was partially funded by the American Heart Association (AHA) and published on Wednesday in the Journal of the American Heart Association.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The findings jibe with existing AHA guidance that people should aim to get a good night’s sleep to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. But it wasn’t clear how “circadian misalignment”—the mismatch between the body’s internal clock and the times at which people actually go to sleep and wake up—might affect heart heath.

Such a mismatch can throw off how our brain responds to reward signals—and that could lead to people engaging in riskier behaviors, the researchers say. “Evening people may be more likely to have behaviors that can affect cardiovascular health, such as poorer diet quality, smoking and inadequate or irregular sleep,” said Sina Kianersi, a research fellow at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and a co-author of the paper, in a statement.

Kianersi and his colleagues found that night owls were more likely to score poorly on the AHA’s “Life’s Essential 8” questionnaire, which looks at a series of eight health and lifestyle metrics, including exercise, smoking, blood pressure and blood sugar. The “evening people” tended to score low because they were more likely to smoke (or live with a smoker) and get inadequate sleep, according to the findings.

If you are a night owl, have courage: the research points to steps you can take to avoid additional heart risks, said Kristen Knutson, an associate professor at Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine, who was not involved in the study, in the same statement. “These findings show that the higher heart disease risks among evening types are partly due to modifiable behaviors such as smoking and sleep,” she said.

“Evening types aren’t inherently less healthy,” Knutson said, “but they face challenges that make it particularly important for them to maintain a healthy lifestyle.”

Jackie Flynn Mogensen is a breaking news reporter at Scientific American. Before joining SciAm, she was a science reporter at Mother Jones, where she received a National Academies Eric and Wendy Schmidt Award for Excellence in Science Communications in 2024. Mogensen holds a master’s degree in environmental communication and a bachelor’s degree in earth sciences from Stanford University. She is based in New York City.

More by Jackie Flynn Mogensen

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe