Linking Forest Fragments Boosts Red Squirrel's Diminishing Genetic Diversity

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: COURTESY OF AUDIO VISUAL CENTER, UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE, UK

To maintain healthy levels of genetic diversity, animal populations need to remain sufficiently large. As habitats become fragmented, however, so too do the resident populations, which can result in a loss of genetic variation. That, in turn, puts these populations at risk of extinction. But if the habitat fragments are linked by corridors, or "stepping stone" patches, they can serve as a single large habitat. A new study reveals dramatic evidence of this fact. Reporting today in the journal Science, researchers describe how habitat defragmentation boosted genetic diversity in British red squirrel populations. The authors note that the findings could have important implications for conservation management of species that occupy fragmented landscapes.

Though their numbers have plummeted elsewhere, red squirrels remain relatively abundant in northern England and southern Scotland, inhabiting a patchwork of forest fragments. To assess how the recent planting of a large new forest linking the patches in the two regions might have impacted the local squirrel populations, Marie L. Hale of the University of Newcastle and colleagues studied genetic markers in 102 dried red-squirrel skins collected in Britain over the past century. Squirrels from the Cumbria region held the key, reflecting an increase in genetic diversity in the 1980s. That surge, it turns out, corresponds to the timing of the maturation of a new forest, which the squirrels apparently used to migrate between western and northern forest fragments. Indeed, the researchers report, the landscape defragmentation led to "substantial genetic mixing of Scottish and Cumbrian genes in squirrel populations up to 100 kilometers away from the site of the new forest."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"These findings suggest that where a network of stepping stones is available within a critical dispersal distance, gene flow can be very rapid through highly fragmented landscapes," the authors conclude. Furthermore, they observe, the study indicates that human-made alterations affecting the connectivity of a landscape can bring about changes in genetic makeup "not only in the area of habitat change but in the populations hundreds of kilometers from the site of habitat change.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe