Little Learners, Trump’s Appeal and Brain Soup

A look inside the March/April issue of Scientific American Mind 

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The social sciences offer powerful tools for making sense of the world in which we live. For policy makers, they provide guidance, in the form of study results, for making our world work better. In this edition, two feature articles examine major contemporary issues through the lens of social science theory and research.

First, our cover story on “Getting Preschool Right,” written by journalist Melinda Wenner Moyer, sounds the alarm on some unfortunate trends in early childhood education. Between 2002 and 2012 the proportion of American four-year-olds attending preschool doubled. This should be a good thing—especially for kids coming from families stretched too thin economically to provide much enrichment at home. But the expansion has been done on the cheap, with low-quality programs, canned curricula and grossly unprepared teachers. In addition, pressure to perform on standardized tests in primary school has backed up into the pre-K classroom, leading to worksheets and teacher-driven instruction that are a poor match for the developing four-year-old mind. Research shows we should be doing the opposite, writes Wenner Moyer in the story. Young kids learn best, she says, “through guided—or ‘scaffolded’—play and hands-on, child-led activities, which can help them learn concepts more deeply.”

In “How Trump Won,” Stephen D. Reicher and S. Alexander Haslam—both members of our board of advisers—analyze the messaging and group psychology dynamics that helped bring Donald Trump to the White House. They deconstruct his carefully staged rallies and explain how they reinforced both a “politics of hope” among his supporters and a sense of us versus them vis-à-vis traditional power elites. Trump, they write in the article, presented himself as a prototypical American—a regular guy, despite his billions, whose plain language and sometimes crude or violent imagery were reviled by critics but, to his fans, marked him as someone who could buck the system and bring change.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


This issue also includes two articles by top neuroscientists. In “The Footprints of Consciousness,” advisory board member Christof Koch walks us through science's centuries-old search for the locus of consciousness in the brain, including his own modern-day quest. Suzana Herculano-Houzel of Vanderbilt University gives a delightful account of her “brain soup” method of counting neurons in the noggins of dozens of species and the surprising light it sheds on our own “remarkable (but not extraordinary)” human equipment.

Claudia Wallis is an award-winning science journalist whose work has appeared in the New York Times, Time, Fortune and the New Republic. She was science editor at Time and managing editor of Scientific American Mind.

More by Claudia Wallis
SA Mind Vol 28 Issue 2This article was published with the title “From the Editor” in SA Mind Vol. 28 No. 2 (), p. 1
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0317-1

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe