Live Chat at 12:30 P.M. EST on What Good Is a Home 3-D Printer?

Join us for a live online chat with Mark Frauenfelder, editor in chief of MAKE magazine and co-editor of Boing Boing. He will help us understand what might be possible with a 3-D printer in your family room

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Join us below at 12:30 P.M. EST on Wednesday, November 28, for a live 30-minute online chat with editor and tech maven Mark Frauenfelder of Boing Boing and MAKE magazine, who will discuss what you might do with a 3-D printer, a machine that can copy the specs from a digital computer file to fabricate a solid object, layer by layer.

Frauenfelder will answer questions about whether 3-D printers will become a revolutionary new technology, like the personal computer or smartphone, or remain a toy for hobbyists. Will a 3-D printer ever be able to function as a digital hardware store, printing out new parts as needed? An alternative scenario: it might just spit out cheap plastic tchotchkes. The theme of this chat was inspired by a skeptical blog post by Scientific American senior editor Gary Stix, which drew several contrary reader responses. We invite you to post chat questions in advance below.

Frauenfelder is editor in chief of MAKE magazine and co-editor of the collaborative blog Boing Boing. Along with his wife, Carla Sinclair, he founded the bOING bOING print zine in 1988, where he acted as editor until the print version folded in 1997. While designing bOING bOING and co-editing it with Sinclair, Frauenfelder became an editor at Wired from 1993 to 1998, and he then became the "Living Online" columnist for Playboy magazine from 1998 to 2002. He was interviewed on Comedy Central's Colbert Report in March 2007 and June 2010.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe