Locating a Break in an Electric Flatiron Cord

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


ELECTRIC cord of the kind furnished for connecting an electric flatiron with the supply, by way of a plug inserted in a lamp socket, is usually heavily insulated with a thick covering oif rubber and a sleeve of coarse woven cotton. For this reason it is rather difficult, when the conductor becomes broken inside its Covering, to locate the exact point of the break; because since the insulation is much stiffer than the stranded copper conductor itself, the ordinary bending test will not show the injury with any degree of certainty. Als an example, a household electric flatiron recently went dead,and an examination showed that the heating elements and the terminals of the iron were all right. To all outward ,ruppearances and tests the cord was all right, too; but a lamp connected by a pair of short wires to its apparatus end failed to light up. As it WaJS inexpedient to obtain a new cord at once, and the implement was needed immediately, the follOWing simiple test was resorted to: The plug on the end of tre cord bEing screwed into the supply socket, with the socket key turned to off, two common brass pins were inserted into the double cDrd, one into each conductor. The pins were so placed that tlJeir points pierced the cotton and rubber insulation and made contact with the stranded copper conductor within. The key switch was then turned on and an ol'dinary sixteen calidle-power incandescent lamp, held in the hand, was pressed against the heads of the two pins in such a manner that Dne pin made, contact with the metal sleeve of the lamp baBe, the other with! the, metal button in the center Df the base. The lamp immediately lighted up, showing that the cord was intact frOm the plug to the point where the pins were inserted. The current being turned off again, the pins were withdrawn, and replaced at a lower point in the cord that is, nearer the apparatus end-and the lamp was pressed against them. This process was repeated at intervals of a few inches until a SPDt was found, within a few inches of the flatiron end, where the lamp did not light up. The pins were then moved back and forth until the exact spot was found where the current ceased to flow. The cord was then cut off at this point and one o.f its conductDrs found to be broken cleanly in two.. I was an easy matter to strip the insulation from the newly-cut ends and refasten them in the flatiron connector plug, when the iron was found to be as good as ever. This is an extremely simple kink,but, like many other simple things, might not Occur to everyone who finds himself in the same predicament. The most important precaution to observe is to turn the current off before inserting or removing the pins. A shock in the fingers is not serious, but it is a trifle unpleasant, especially with alternating current at 110 volts. Soldering Flux.-A good soldering flux for copper is a heavy paste.of resin. This paste is made by dissolviiig as much resin in benzine as the benzine will take up. The paste is easily applied with a stiff brush.-H. D. Chapman.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 105 Issue 9This article was published with the title “Locating a Break in an Electric Flatiron Cord” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 105 No. 9 (), p. 191
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican08261911-191b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe