New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Long Live Rat Cells

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Human cells, extracted from the body and grown in a culture dish, don't divide forever. With every division, their telomeres--the ends of their chromosomes--get shorter, providing a molecular clock of sorts that stops their growth after a defined number of doublings. This phenomenon is termed "replicative senescence" and prevents cells from accumulating too many genetic mutations that may turn them into cancer cells. Rat and mouse cells do not feature such a "countdown" mechanism, and researchers from London have now shown that at least some types of rat cells from the nervous system can divide virtually forever without turning cancerous.

Until now, it had been a riddle to many researchers as to why cultured rodent cells did stop dividing, despite the fact that they have an enzyme called telomerase, which keeps their telomeres at a constant length. But the reason, as it turns out, is probably that these cells were kept under the wrong conditions. Two groups from University College London, led by Alison Lloyd and Martin Raff, report in ScienceExpress today that glial cells and oligodendrocyte precursor cells, both removed from the central nervous system of young rats, can divide indefinitely--in one case for more than 20 months--if the culture medium contains or lacks certain ingredients, such as hormones. Unlike cancer cells, though, which also grow forever but are unstoppable, these cells still stop dividing if, for example, they get damaged by x-rays.

Why do human cells have an built-in "division clock" that some rat cells seem to lack? Humans are larger and live longer than rats. It is more likely that one of their many cells, over a life time, will acquire enough mutations to turn into a cancer cell. One way to prevent this malignant transition is to limit the number of cell divisions. In a rat, this safety measure might not be necessary.

Do the telomeres in cancer cells get shorter each time the cell divides?, Scientific American, January 2001. Turning Back the Strands of Time, Scientific American, February 1998.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe