Long Live the Fruit Flies!

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Fruit flies with a mutation in one copy of a gene that plays a role in energy metabolism live almost twice as long as their wild type cousins, according to a new study. Stephen L. Helfand and colleagues from the University of Connecticut appropriately named the gene Indy for "I¿m not dead yet"--a quote from Monty Python and the Holy Grail.

Living a longer life does not mean the mutated flies endure a lengthier old age. In fact, they lay just as many eggs and are just as active as ordinary Drosophila flies. The females actually remain fertile for longer. Their altered gene, Indy, encodes a protein that is very similar to a human membrane transport protein, which takes up certain molecules of the Kreb's cycle, a series of chemical reactions in the body that create energy. The Indy protein is made, among other fly tissues, in the midgut and in the fat body--the fly¿s equivalent to a liver. Indy is not the first known gene that determines life span--Methuselah is another in flies--but it is the first that appears to have a direct role in metabolism. Therefore it "may represent a new class of longevity genes," the scientists write in an article in today¿s issue of Science.

Mutating the fly transporter may slow down energy metabolism, as does caloric restriction (eating less), a tactic known to increase the life span of mice. Some people already practice caloric restriction in the hopes of living longer (see The Famine of Youth), but there is no proof as yet that this strategy works in humans. Further examination of Indy, on the other hand, might provide a "point of access for genetic and pharmacological interventions for extending life span," the researchers write.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe