New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Long Live the Fruit Flies!

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Fruit flies with a mutation in one copy of a gene that plays a role in energy metabolism live almost twice as long as their wild type cousins, according to a new study. Stephen L. Helfand and colleagues from the University of Connecticut appropriately named the gene Indy for "I¿m not dead yet"--a quote from Monty Python and the Holy Grail.

Living a longer life does not mean the mutated flies endure a lengthier old age. In fact, they lay just as many eggs and are just as active as ordinary Drosophila flies. The females actually remain fertile for longer. Their altered gene, Indy, encodes a protein that is very similar to a human membrane transport protein, which takes up certain molecules of the Kreb's cycle, a series of chemical reactions in the body that create energy. The Indy protein is made, among other fly tissues, in the midgut and in the fat body--the fly¿s equivalent to a liver. Indy is not the first known gene that determines life span--Methuselah is another in flies--but it is the first that appears to have a direct role in metabolism. Therefore it "may represent a new class of longevity genes," the scientists write in an article in today¿s issue of Science.

Mutating the fly transporter may slow down energy metabolism, as does caloric restriction (eating less), a tactic known to increase the life span of mice. Some people already practice caloric restriction in the hopes of living longer (see The Famine of Youth), but there is no proof as yet that this strategy works in humans. Further examination of Indy, on the other hand, might provide a "point of access for genetic and pharmacological interventions for extending life span," the researchers write.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe