Long-Lived Worms

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Genes control to a great extent how long an organism can live. For example, researchers have known for a while that adding an extra copy of a gene called SIR2 to a yeast cell lengthens its lifetime. Now they have found that the equivalent gene in worms works the same way: worms with an additional copy of sir-2.1 live up to 50 percent longer than their wild cousins.

Heidi Tissenbaum and Leonard Guarente, who publish their findings in today¿s Nature, also present some clues as to how sir-2.1 might extend a worm¿s lifetime. In the worm's cells, its product interferes with a chain of signals, which are triggered by an insulin-like hormone and might tell the cell whether, say, nutrients are available. The result did not come as a total surprise because other worm genes that play a role in aging¿such as daf-2¿are part of the same signaling cascade. Like SIR2 in yeast, sir-2.1 may exert its effect by shutting down a number of other genes.

The big question now is whetherSIR2-like genes also regulate the rate of aging in humans. It might turn out that the very same gene determines how often a simple yeast cell divides¿and how long a human being can live.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe