New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Long-Lived Worms

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Genes control to a great extent how long an organism can live. For example, researchers have known for a while that adding an extra copy of a gene called SIR2 to a yeast cell lengthens its lifetime. Now they have found that the equivalent gene in worms works the same way: worms with an additional copy of sir-2.1 live up to 50 percent longer than their wild cousins.

Heidi Tissenbaum and Leonard Guarente, who publish their findings in today¿s Nature, also present some clues as to how sir-2.1 might extend a worm¿s lifetime. In the worm's cells, its product interferes with a chain of signals, which are triggered by an insulin-like hormone and might tell the cell whether, say, nutrients are available. The result did not come as a total surprise because other worm genes that play a role in aging¿such as daf-2¿are part of the same signaling cascade. Like SIR2 in yeast, sir-2.1 may exert its effect by shutting down a number of other genes.

The big question now is whetherSIR2-like genes also regulate the rate of aging in humans. It might turn out that the very same gene determines how often a simple yeast cell divides¿and how long a human being can live.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe