New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Long-Lost Remains of Neandertal Newborn Recovered

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Most stories recounting famed fossil discoveries include tales of long hours spent painstakingly searching through dirt and dust. For Bruno Maureille's latest find, however, all it took was a trip to the museum. Maureille rediscovered fossils belonging to a four-month-old Neandertal during a routine survey of a French museum's collections. A paper describing the skeleton (see image), which is one of the most complete Neandertal individuals ever recovered, is published today in the journal Nature.

The 40,000-year-old remains were first discovered in 1914 in an exposed cliff near Le Moustier in the Dordogne region of France. Named Le Moustier 2, the skeleton disappeared just a few years later. Although many scientists believed the fossils had been lost in Paris, Maureille, an anthropologist at the University of Bordeaux, encountered them in 1996 at the National Museum of Prehistory in Les Eyzies, also in the Dordogne. While cleaning and restoring the specimens, he writes, it became clear that they in fact belonged to the missing Le Moustier 2. That's because some of the bones were still encased in sediment that also housed telltale signs of the Vezere River, which flows past the Le Moustier cliff. Moreover, faunal remains in the surrounding sediment were identical to others recovered from the same cliff. With the addition of a right femur and a right humerus (which were wrongly attributed to another Neandertal newborn), Le Moustier 2 is now nearly complete, missing only its shoulder blades and pubic bone.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe