Long-Sought Stellar Sulfur Found

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Though many people may not have known it was absent, astronomers say they have found the missing stellar sulfur. The cosmically abundant element is present in meteorites and dust particles from comets in the form of solid grains of iron sulfide (FeS). But direct evidence of such sulfide grains from objects similar to the early solar nebula was lacking, until now. According to a report published today in the journal Nature, FeS does indeed exist in the spectrum of young stellar objects. Problem was, it had been mistaken for something else.

Lindsay P. Keller of the NASA Johnson Space Center and his colleagues located the lost sulfur by comparing the infrared spectra of meteorites, cometary dust particles and laboratory standards containing FeS with recent spectra of protostars obtained by the Infrared Space Observatory (ISO). In so doing, they found there was an excellent match (in terms of peak position, width and shape) for a region in the ISO spectra that was previously attributed to iron oxide. These findings, the authors write, imply "that FeS grains are an important but previously unrecognized component of circumstellar dust." The scientists propose that the bulk of this FeS is formed either in the collapse phase of the molecular cloud or in the disk surrounding the young star. The team further determined that the grains of FeS must be miniscule¿less than 200 nanometers thick¿in order to produce the ISO spectra. Considering the difficulty many people have finding objects much larger than this, such as keys, the astronomers' find seems all the more impressive.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe