Looking Forward: A Short History of the Future in Scientific American

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Since its founding in August 1845, 171 years ago, Scientific American has been a magazine with an obsession: how the process of scientific research and innovation not only fosters discoveries but also helps human society shape our own destiny. In that first issue, for instance, the editors promised to be the “advocate of industry and enterprise.” They reported on the latest in transportation (an illustration of an aerodynamically improved railway car decorated the cover), communication (the editors praised Samuel Morse's telegraph as a “wonder of the age”) and many patents aimed at easing human labors. And—given that the titles of most publications have an aspirational quality—the weekly broadsheet clearly sought to nurture more “scientific” Americans.

Moreover, for almost as long as Scientific American has been published, the editors have at least annually (and sometimes even more often) decided to devote an entire issue to looking at emerging topics and technologies that demonstrate how science provides solutions to societal challenges. An 1899 special edition touted bicycles and automobiles, which were changing the face of transportation. As the magazine developed alongside the young U.S., it found other ways to highlight and encourage our progress to a better tomorrow. It created trophies to goad the Wright brothers and others to increase the lengths of aircraft flights, for instance. The magazine covered radio and television decades before they arrived. A 1954 article on “Computers in Business” speculated about the benefits—and possible dangers—of thinking machines. I could go on.

Supporting that prescience: Scientific American has always had a mix of award-winning writers, both journalists and scientists (now up to 158 laureates, who have collectively written more than 250 articles about their disciplines).


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


So about a year ago, when the editors gathered to discuss the focus of our 2016 single-topic issue, the team members, as always, proposed and then talked about lots of great ideas. But among the many compelling themes, one clearly dominated. Humans, in what is now increasingly commonly called the “Anthropocene,” have become the major driving force in shaping our planet's future, as well as our own, toward uncertain ends. In effect, as executive editor Fred Guterl dubbed it, we are running “The Human Experiment.” In this issue, Guterl, senior editor Seth Fletcher, design director Michael Mrak and their colleagues have put together a dynamic look at the tales of our times, exploring nine big related questions in the feature articles and the companion pieces.

Borrowing from Pogo: “We have met the future, and it is us.”

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina
Scientific American Magazine Vol 315 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Looking Forward” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 315 No. 3 (), p. 4
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0916-4

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe