Low-Carbon Investment Is Moving Too Slowly to Rein in Warming, U.N. Warns

Growing recognition of climate change’s economic threat has not stymied fossil fuel investments

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Not nearly enough money is flowing into low-carbon investments to meet the goals of the Paris climate accord, according to a U.N. report released yesterday.

Since 2014, when the U.N. Environment Programme created the U.N. Environment Inquiry to study ways to make the global financial system less reliant on fossil fuels, central banks, regulators and the private sector have noted more and more that climate change poses an economic threat to the world.

But investors are moving too slowly to protect the Earth, the Environment Inquiry said yesterday, when it issued a report that took four years to produce.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“Over the four years of the Inquiry's operations, we have seen reform of the global financial system gather pace as banks, investors and regulators realize they must step up — not just to protect people and the planet, but their bottom lines,” said Erik Solheim, head of U.N. Environment, in a statement.

Still, the inquiry said, “current financial flows are still nowhere near enough to deliver the trillions of dollars needed” to meet the Paris deal.

By most estimates, adapting to climate change will cost governments trillions of dollars.

World Bank President Jim Yong Kim and International Monetary Fund Managing Director Christine Lagarde told finance ministers in Washington, D.C., in the fall that trillions of dollars will be needed to rebuild from natural disasters associated with climate change (Climatewire, Oct. 16, 2017).

Nations could raise trillions of dollars by eliminating fossil fuel subsidies, they said.

“Sustainable finance is certainly starting to get contagious,” the report reads. But that contagion is not spreading fast enough, and investors continue to plunge their money into investments tied to fossil fuels, according to the Environment Inquiry.

“Clearly, some capital is flowing to the new economy that we need,” it said. “But far more is continuing to support the old economy.”

Reprinted from Climatewire with permission from E&E News. E&E provides daily coverage of essential energy and environmental news at www.eenews.net.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe