New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

50, 100 & 150 Years Ago: Lunar Idea, Milk Agenda and Balloon Dismay

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


JUNE 1957
MOON DUST--"The possibility of actually bringing back some of the moon's material is a scientific bonanza so alluring that ingenious schemes have been proposed to accomplish it, even without landing on the moon. We might, for example, send a pair of rockets, one trailing the other closely by means of a homing device. The first rocket would drop a small atomic bomb on the moon. Since the moon has no atmosphere and comparatively little gravity, the bomb cloud would rise very high. The second rocket could dive into the cloud, collect some of the spray and emerge from its dive by means of an auxiliary jet. Of course, such a maneuver would require a miracle of electronic guidance.--Krafft A. Ehricke and George Gamow"

JUNE 1907
JAWS--"The plain fact is that the ferociousness of the shark is too well documented by long ex-perience to be dismissed as a legend. Jacques-Yves Cousteau, the greatest living expert on modern deep-sea diving, has reported harrowing encounters with sharks. Off the Cape Verde Islands of Portugal, Cousteau and his fellow diver Frédéric Dumas found themselves closely pressed by an eight-foot gray shark, later joined by two five-footers and several blue sharks. The pack resisted all attempts to drive them off: they would shy away only to come back almost at once. The two men used every method in the diver's book. The sharks were not scared off by any of these tricks, or by the shark 'repellent' (copper acetate) strapped to the divers' legs or by a blow Cousteau gave one approaching shark on the nose with his heavy undersea camera. The two back-tracking divers got out just in time."

Scientific American Magazine Vol 296 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Lunar Idea -- Milk Agenda -- Balloon Dismay” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 296 No. 6 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican062007-1LA7MIaHWiUL0JGO7ziaRo

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe