Lying Liars

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Pathological lying may stem from an unusual imbalance of brain matter, say scientists at the University of Southern California. Working with senior investigators, doctoral student Yaling Yang scanned the brains of 12 self-described pathological liars as well as other volunteers who had no history of deception. Yang was surprised to find that the liars’ brains had 22 percent more white matter in the prefrontal regions that govern decision making and judgment. So-called white matter makes up the wiring among neurons, which are sometimes collectively called gray matter.

Pathological lying can be very complicated. People who do so must present information that appears correct and yet harbors falsehoods. “It may just be easier for them to tell lies,” Yang says, because the excessive white matter creates an abundance of connections among otherwise contradictory, compartmentalized data. Further studies are needed to determine if the fabricators are born with more white matter or develop it as a result of their frequent fibbing.

Other scientists who have done functional MRI scans of people lying in real time also point to excessive activation in the prefrontal lobes and say the patterns of activity can serve as reliable detectors of deception. If so, scanners could one day move from the lab bench to the court bench.

SA Mind Vol 17 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Lying Liars” in SA Mind Vol. 17 No. 2 (), p. 8
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0406-8b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe