New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Lying Liars

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Pathological lying may stem from an unusual imbalance of brain matter, say scientists at the University of Southern California. Working with senior investigators, doctoral student Yaling Yang scanned the brains of 12 self-described pathological liars as well as other volunteers who had no history of deception. Yang was surprised to find that the liars’ brains had 22 percent more white matter in the prefrontal regions that govern decision making and judgment. So-called white matter makes up the wiring among neurons, which are sometimes collectively called gray matter.

Pathological lying can be very complicated. People who do so must present information that appears correct and yet harbors falsehoods. “It may just be easier for them to tell lies,” Yang says, because the excessive white matter creates an abundance of connections among otherwise contradictory, compartmentalized data. Further studies are needed to determine if the fabricators are born with more white matter or develop it as a result of their frequent fibbing.

Other scientists who have done functional MRI scans of people lying in real time also point to excessive activation in the prefrontal lobes and say the patterns of activity can serve as reliable detectors of deception. If so, scanners could one day move from the lab bench to the court bench.

SA Mind Vol 17 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Lying Liars” in SA Mind Vol. 17 No. 2 (), p. 8
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0406-8b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe