50, 100 & 150 Years Ago: Lysenko Retreats, Consumers Benefit and Neptune's Realm Photographed

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

JUNE 1956
THE ANTIPROTON--"Since it was apparent that creation of the antiproton required tremendous energy, the most likely place to look for it was in cosmic rays. On a few occasions investigators found events which seemed to signal the generation of an antiproton, but there was never sufficient information to identify it with certainty. When the Bevatron at the University of California began to bombard a target made of copper with six-Bev (billion electron volts) protons, the next problem was to detect and identify any antiprotons created. A plan for the search was devised by Owen Chamberlain, Thomas Ypsilantis and the authors of this article. Tracks of about 20 antiprotons have now been detected in emulsions by observers in Berkeley. --Emilio Segrè and Clyde E. Wiegand" [Editors' note: Emilio Segrè won a Nobel Prize in Physics in 1959.]

POLITICALLY CORRECT CORN--"Trofim Lysenko's personal rule over U.S.S.R. genetics came to an end in April with his resignation as head of the All-Union Academy of Agricultural Sciences. The event is interpreted to mean that after 15 years during which 'Mendelian' genetics was a politically discredited branch of science in the Soviet Union, it is once again acceptable. Hybrid corn, which is incompatible with Lysenko's theories of acquired characteristics, is now being planted on Soviet farms. The week before Lysenko retired from prom-inence there was an announcement from Moscow that the scientific works of Nikolai Vavilov were about to be published. Vavilov, a world-famous geneticist, opposed Lysenko's rise, and in 1942 died in exile in Siberia."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American