Machine-Learning Software Scans Satellite Images to Find Hidden Poverty

Machine-learning software analyzes satellite images to find remote areas that need help

Daniel Stolle

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Last year the United Nations set a goal of eliminating extreme poverty worldwide by 2030. That's an audacious target. One of the first steps—figuring out where the most impoverished people live—has proved surprisingly difficult. Conducting economic surveys in poor or conflict-prone countries can be expensive and dangerous. Researchers have tried to work around this limitation by searching nighttime satellite images for unusually dark areas. “Places lit up at night are generally better off,” explains Marshall Burke, an assistant professor of earth science systems at Stanford University. But this method is imperfect, especially for differentiating between grades of poverty. From space, at night, mild and extreme poverty look the same—dark.

Burke and his team at Stanford think they have found a way to improve the study of satellite images using machine learning. The researchers trained image-analysis software on both daytime and nighttime satellite imagery for five African nations. By combining both sets of data, the computer “learned” which daytime features (roads, urban areas, agricultural lands) were correlated with different levels of night-lights brightness. “The night lights are a tool to figure out what's important in the daytime imagery,” Burke says.

Once the training was complete, the software could spot impoverished areas simply by looking at daytime satellite images. When the researchers compared the results with survey data from the five African countries, they found that their method outperformed other nontraditional poverty-predicting tools, including the night-lights model. Governments and nonprofits could use the tool to determine whom to target in a cash-transfer program, for example, or to evaluate how well a certain antipoverty policy works. The researchers have plans to collaborate with the World Bank to chart out poverty in places such as Somalia. Next, Burke and his team want to use their new technique to create an Africa-wide map.

Annie Sneed is a science journalist who has written for the New York Times, Wired, Public Radio International and Fast Company.

More by Annie Sneed
Scientific American Magazine Vol 315 Issue 6This article was published with the title “5. Poverty-Predicting Software” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 315 No. 6 (), p. 37
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1216-37

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe