New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Machine-Learning Software Scans Satellite Images to Find Hidden Poverty

Machine-learning software analyzes satellite images to find remote areas that need help

Daniel Stolle

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Last year the United Nations set a goal of eliminating extreme poverty worldwide by 2030. That's an audacious target. One of the first steps—figuring out where the most impoverished people live—has proved surprisingly difficult. Conducting economic surveys in poor or conflict-prone countries can be expensive and dangerous. Researchers have tried to work around this limitation by searching nighttime satellite images for unusually dark areas. “Places lit up at night are generally better off,” explains Marshall Burke, an assistant professor of earth science systems at Stanford University. But this method is imperfect, especially for differentiating between grades of poverty. From space, at night, mild and extreme poverty look the same—dark.

Burke and his team at Stanford think they have found a way to improve the study of satellite images using machine learning. The researchers trained image-analysis software on both daytime and nighttime satellite imagery for five African nations. By combining both sets of data, the computer “learned” which daytime features (roads, urban areas, agricultural lands) were correlated with different levels of night-lights brightness. “The night lights are a tool to figure out what's important in the daytime imagery,” Burke says.

Once the training was complete, the software could spot impoverished areas simply by looking at daytime satellite images. When the researchers compared the results with survey data from the five African countries, they found that their method outperformed other nontraditional poverty-predicting tools, including the night-lights model. Governments and nonprofits could use the tool to determine whom to target in a cash-transfer program, for example, or to evaluate how well a certain antipoverty policy works. The researchers have plans to collaborate with the World Bank to chart out poverty in places such as Somalia. Next, Burke and his team want to use their new technique to create an Africa-wide map.

Annie Sneed is a science journalist who has written for the New York Times, Wired, Public Radio International and Fast Company.

More by Annie Sneed
Scientific American Magazine Vol 315 Issue 6This article was published with the title “5. Poverty-Predicting Software” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 315 No. 6 (), p. 37
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1216-37

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe