Centennial Anniversary: Bingham Rediscovers the Lost Inca City of Machu Picchu [Slide Show]

Although it may have been discovered by previous explorers, the young Yale lecturer introduced the world to an ancient archaeological masterpiece--for better and worse

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


On July 24, 1911, Yale University lecturer and amateur archaeologist Hiram Bingham completed a steep climb from Peru's Urubamba River valley through the thin air of the Andes Mountains to one of the most significant and lasting discoveries in archeological history—the Inca ruins of Machu Picchu. Perched about 2,400 meters above sea level and 80 kilometers from the onetime Inca capital of Cusco, the "Lost City of the Incas" remained undiscovered by the Spanish throughout their conquest of Peru in the 1500s. As a result Bingham was able to introduce the world to a relatively pristine sanctuary of a once-mighty pre-Columbian empire that would be carefully studied by archeologists, geologists, anthropologists and engineers for a century to come.

Bingham's expedition had traveled to the Urubamba Valley, near the village of Ollantaytambo (today's best surviving example of an Inca town) in search of Vitcos, the last Inca capital before the arrival of Spanish conquistadors. What Bingham instead found was "a remarkably large and well-preserved abandoned city practically untouched by the hands of the spoiler, and apparently unknown to the Spanish chroniclers," Bingham wrote in the March 26, 1914, issue of Nature. (Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group.)

During its rediscovery and in subsequent trips to the site, Bingham and his colleagues excavated the ruins at Machu Picchu. "Many difficulties had to be overcome, but we were eventually successful in locating more than one hundred burial caves," Bingham wrote. "The excavation yielded a considerable amount of anthropological material, including human and animal bones, a large number of potsherds and a few stone, silver, and bronze implements." Bingham also noted that he and his colleagues found no gold, the treasure that fueled much of Spain's seemingly insatiable pillaging of the Inca Empire.

"Machu Picchu is in a remarkably good state of preservation, and its architecture has not become confused by Spanish efforts to build churches and villas," as occurred in Cusco and elsewhere, Bingham wrote. "It is safe to say that Machu Picchu was essentially a city of refuge." Given the Incas had no written language, the true purpose of Machu Picchu remains open to debate, with some calling it a government retreat and others convinced that it was a defensive citadel.

Whereas Bingham's archeological finds were a significant breakthrough in the study of pre-Columbian cultures in South America, his handling of these artifacts launched a custody battle between the Yale Peabody Museum and the Peruvian government that has been festering for many decades. Peru claims to have agreed to an 18-month loan to Yale of the ceramic pieces, silver statues, jewelry and human bones that Bingham and his team excavated. Yale argued that the artifacts belonged in a museum where they could be properly maintained and displayed. The museum relented last year and recently sent 350 artifacts back to their native land.

Machu Picchu has since become a Peruvian Historical Sanctuary, UNESCO World Heritage Site and major tourist destination. In order to preserve the site, a no-fly zone was implemented over the ruins, and tourism has been limited in recent years.

In honor of the centennial of Bingham's initial expedition to Machu Picchu, Scientific American presents a slide show of images from the site of the famous ruins as well as the 88-kilometer Inca Trail that stretches from Cusco to the Sun Gate on Machu Picchu Mountain.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe