New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Magnetic Fields May Warp Planetary Nebulae

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


At the end of their lives stars like our sun eject expanding gas shells known as planetary nebulae. Despite being spewed out by spherical stars, some 80 percent of these impressive displays are not spherical themselves, instead they exhibit complex morphologies. Astronomers have now, for the first time, detected magnetic fields in the central stars of four planetary nebulae, suggesting a cause of the irregular structures.

Stefan Jordan of the Astronomisches Rechen-Institut in Heidelberg, Germany, and his colleagues used a tool from the Very Large Telescope at the Paranal Observatory in Atacama, Chile, to measure the polarization of light emitted by stars at the center of planetary nebulae. Because atoms change their energy in response to a magnetic field in a predictable way--a process known as the Zeeman effect--it is possible to calculate the strength of a magnetic field from such polarization measurements. The team analyzed magnetic field data for each of the central stars in the four nonspherical nebulae they studied, and found that their fields reach approximately 1,000 times the strength of the sun's magnetic field.

The team next hopes to search spherical planetary nebulae for any signs of magnetic fields, to test their theory that these forces are responsible for intricately shaped nebulae. The findings will appear in an upcoming issue of the journal Astronomy and Astrophysics.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe