Magnetic Stimulation May Halt Rumination in Depression

Transcranial magnetic stimulation could correct faulty connectivity

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Many people with drug-resistant depression have found relief via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Yet the mechanism of this relief has been unknown. Now a study finds that TMS may work by correcting connectivity.

Researchers at Weill Cornell Medical College used functional MRI to scan the brains of 17 patients with depression and 35 healthy volunteers while they were not focusing on anything in particular. Previous research has shown that the regions active in this resting state, known as the default mode network, are hyperconnected in depression. Because these areas regulate internal focus, scientists believe the extra connectivity may be related to depression's repetitive ruminations.

The new study first confirmed these regions' hyperconnectivity in the people with depression. Then the patients received a standard five-week course of TMS before their brains were scanned again. Not all patients benefited, but those who did revealed a pattern. Patients who improved no longer had too many connections; their scans were indistinguishable from those of healthy subjects. In addition, patients who initially had tighter links between resting-state regions were more likely to respond to TMS—further evidence that this finding explains how TMS treats depression.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The results suggest a way to eventually customize treatment. A patient could undergo a quick fMRI scan, for example, to learn whether his or her brain is hyperconnected—and if not, avoid a costly and time-consuming regimen of TMS. Study co-author Marc Dubin, a physician and neuroscientist at Weill Cornell, notes that targeting a person's specific abnormalities could help individuals find an effective treatment more quickly.

Nessa Bryce is a clinical psychology Ph.D. candidate at Harvard University. Her work explores how childhood experiences, particularly traumatic ones, shape our brains and thus how we understand and interact with the world around us.

More by Nessa Bryce
SA Mind Vol 26 Issue 1This article was published with the title “A Fix For Faulty Wiring” in SA Mind Vol. 26 No. 1 (), p. 13
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0115-13b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe